Verity Works
−96%
Report time
18 hrs
Returned weekly
The shift report was the thing nobody wanted to do. It writes itself now, and I have not thought about it since March.

A week finding where the hours actually go, then the systems that take them back - inside the tools you already run.
40+ systems in production

Verity Works
The shift report was the thing nobody wanted to do. It writes itself now, and I have not thought about it since March.
Running inside teams like these
A small senior team that builds AI automations straight into production. No stalled pilots, no shelfware.
Systems in production — live automations running inside client tools today.
Days to first launch — from kickoff to the first system running on your real data.
Hours automated — manual work handed over to systems across our client base.
Human sign-off — nothing irreversible happens without a person saying so.
Open a service to see what is inside. Most engagements use two or three, never all four.
AI agents
Support, sales and internal assistants that work your queue the way your best person would, inside the tools you already run.
What we offer

Workflows
We connect the tools you already pay for, so work moves between them without anyone copying, pasting or chasing an update.
What we offer

Documents
Invoices, contracts and forms get read, checked and filed the moment they arrive with a person signing off where it matters.
What we offer

Support
First-line support that resolves the routine and routes the rest, with monitoring your team can actually read.
What we offer

Automations live inside the stack you already use — nothing new to install or learn.
Every system has a sign-off. Nothing irreversible happens without approval.
From kickoff to the first system running on your real data — weeks, not quarters.
Documented and handed over. Stop whenever you like — you keep everything we built.
The plan is not the deliverable — the running system is. Every step here exists to get you to something your team can actually own.
A week inside your actual workflow — the tools, the handoffs, the things people do twice. You get a written map of where the hours go and which of them are worth automating.
We pick the two or three jobs with the best return and write down exactly what the system will do, where a person signs off, and how we will know it worked.
We build inside your own tools, not a sandbox, and you see it working at the end of every week. Rollout is staged, so nothing goes live before you have watched it run.
Documentation, a training session and monitoring you can actually read. Your team runs it from here, and we stay reachable for the first stretch.
Five engagements still in production. Each one started as a week of looking at where the time actually went.

Invoice triage that runs itself

Shift reports nobody has to write

Intake read the hour it arrives

The monthly pack, assembled overnight

Every enquiry answered before lunch
Four of the five engagements in the strip above. The fifth is still in its first month.
Verity Works
−96%
Report time
18 hrs
Returned weekly
The shift report was the thing nobody wanted to do. It writes itself now, and I have not thought about it since March.

Alder Health
1 hr
Intake turnaround
100%
Human reviewed
They spent the first week just watching how we actually work. Every proposal after that was about something real.

Kestrel Capital
2 hrs
Monthly pack
14 mo
Still running
We had been sold automation twice before. This is the first one that is still running a year later.

Brantley & Co
5 min
First reply
3
Changes we made
The handover was the impressive part. Our own team changed it three times without ever calling them.

Five things that go wrong with automation projects, and what we do instead. Most of them cost less to avoid than to fix.
No account layer in front of the work. The person who runs your audit is the person who builds it. Open a card to see who does what.

Spends the first week of every engagement inside the client’s workflow with a stopwatch and a notebook. Wrote the audit format the studio still uses.

Turns the audit into a plan somebody can argue with: what gets automated, what stays manual, and what it costs to be wrong about either.

Builds inside the tools already on the desk rather than beside them. Has never shipped a system that needed a new tab to use.

Writes the runbook and then makes somebody on the client side run it while she watches. A handover nobody rehearsed is not a handover.
Two ways to pay for the same work: monthly, or yearly for 20% less. Both agreed in writing before anything is built.
One system at a time, start to finish.
Two or three systems running in parallel.
One system at a time, start to finish.
Two or three systems running in parallel.
Every engagement opens with a written plan of what will run and what it replaces.
You talk to the person writing the automation, not to a manager relaying it.
Studio adds monitoring and monthly reviews, catching drift before it reaches your data.
Move between plans or pause when the queue is empty. Nothing is locked to a year.
The eight that come up in nearly every first call, answered the way we would answer them on the call.
No, that is the first week. The audit sits inside your actual workflow, counts where the hours go, and comes back as a written map of what is worth automating and what is not. Plenty of clients stop there and keep the map.
21 days from kickoff to a system running on your real data. Two of those weeks are the audit and the blueprint. The build is the short part, because by then there is nothing left to guess about.
The audit is $4,000, and it comes off the first build if you continue. Everything after it is priced in writing before anyone starts, and the number does not move once the scope is signed.
You do. It runs in your accounts, on your keys, inside the tools your team already opens every morning. The handover includes a written runbook, so changing it later does not require us.
Every system ships with a human sign-off point and a log of what it decided and why. Nothing lands in a customer inbox or a ledger without someone able to check it first, that is a design rule here, not a setting.
Subscriptions cancel any month and you keep everything built up to that point. Project work ends at handover with 90 days of support attached. There is no clause that keeps a system hostage.
No. The systems are built inside the accounts and apps your team already opens, and the audit starts by listing them. If something genuinely has to be replaced, that is a line in the blueprint you approve before anything is built, not a surprise halfway through.
Less than most people expect. A couple of hours in the first week for the audit, one review of the blueprint, and someone to sign off the handover. The build itself does not need anyone from your side in the room.
Send the shape of the problem, not a specification. The reply comes from the person who would run the audit.
The person who would run the audit answers, not a form handler.
Thirty minutes. We look at it together and say whether it is worth automating.
We have received your submission and our team will be in touch.